- To:
- Director, FBI
- From:
- Guy Hottel, SAC, Washington
- Date:
- March 22, 1950
- Subject:
- Flying Saucers, Information Concerning
An investigator for the Air Forces stated that three so-called flying saucers had been recovered in New Mexico. They were described as being circular in shape with raised centers, approximately 50 feet in diameter. Each one was occupied by three bodies of human shape but only three feet tall, dressed in metallic cloth of a very fine texture. Each body was bandaged in a manner similar to the blackout suits used by speed fliers and test pilots.FBI Vault — Guy Hottel Memo, March 22, 1950

Important Notes
This site collects real, publicly available UAP/UFO records — for curiosity, education and entertainment. It's an experiment, not an official statement.
Every piece is labeled for what it is — testimony, claim, or speculation — and sourced. Follow the links if you want to know more.
Reporting a claim about a government or a faith is not an endorsement of it. There's no intention here to offend or denigrate any belief.
Most of the writing here was researched and drafted with Claude Code, under supervision. All the visuals are generated with Midjourney, an experiment around the word "vessel".
Without further ado, let's dive deeper




Case closed
On December 17, 1969, the Secretary of the Air Force announced the end of Project Blue Book, the program that had been collecting and evaluating UFO reports for twenty-two years. Its records were declassified and handed to the National Archives.
From 1947 to 1969, a total of 12,618 sightings were reported to Project BLUE BOOK. Of these 701 remain "Unidentified."
The third of the three conclusions the Air Force published on closing the program:
there has been no evidence indicating that sightings categorized as "unidentified" are extraterrestrial vehicles
Seven hundred and one cases were filed as unexplained and the office was shut. For the next fifty years the subject would live mostly outside government — in books, in cinema, in the hands of enthusiasts.
National Archives — Air Force UFO records and Project Blue BookSomething is moving
In June 2021 the Office of the Director of National Intelligence delivered a nine-page preliminary assessment to Congress, covering 144 reports made by U.S. military personnel between 2004 and 2021. It could explain one of them with high confidence: a large, deflating balloon.
The report also put on the record something the government had never written down before — that the obstacle was not the sightings, but what happened to the people who reported them.
Narratives from aviators in the operational community and analysts from the military and IC describe disparagement associated with observing UAP, reporting it, or attempting to discuss it with colleagues.
Fifty-two years after Blue Book was closed, the stigma it helped create was named in a document addressed to Congress.
ODNI — "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena", June 25, 2021Under oath
Between 2023 and 2024 two men who had worked inside the apparatus testified before the House Oversight Committee.
David Grusch served as co-lead for unidentified anomalous phenomena analysis at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. On July 26, 2023 he told the committee what he had been told:
I was informed, in the course of my official duties, of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program to which I was denied access to those additional read-ons.
He also drew the line himself, in the same statement:
But as I stand here under oath now, I am speaking to the facts as I have been told them.
Luis Elizondo, who managed a Special Access Program on behalf of the White House and the National Security Council, testified on November 13, 2024 and drew no such line:
Let me be clear: UAP are real. Advanced technologies not made by our Government – or any other government – are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe.
Asked directly by Representative Tim Burchett when the U.S. government first became aware of evidence of nonhuman intelligence, Grusch had given a date that goes back much further than Roswell.
The public claim
Popular culture has fixed the public's idea of first contact on Roswell, 1947. Grusch's answer to Burchett pushed the date back further:
I like to use the term nonhuman. I do not like to denote origin. Keeps the aperture open both scientifically. Certainly, like I have discussed publicly, previously 1930's.
That is all of it, on the record and under oath: "previously 1930's". No mention of Italy, of Magenta, of the Vatican. Those details you may have already heard — a disc-shaped craft recovered near Magenta in 1933, a secret channel handing the wreckage to U.S. forces in 1944-45 — come from an interview with NewsNation's Ross Coulthart on June 11, 2023, six weeks before he ever testified.
Their paper trail is thinner still. The Magenta documents surfaced in 1996, sent by an anonymous source to Italian ufologist Roberto Pinotti, and were first shown publicly in 2000. A forensic analyst called the paper and ink "consistent" with the era but noted it "doesn't rule out a skilled forger", and no Italian state archive has ever confirmed the program existed.
— Sworn testimony, a televised interview, and an anonymous envelope are three different things. The story that travels online is assembled from all three.
The observables
Elizondo's team did not start from what the objects looked like. They started from what the objects did, and reduced every reported capability to a short list of performance characteristics — five of them, a sixth added later. Anything that showed them was worth a second look.
We created our list of six observables to better understand what we couldn't understand. They allowed us to better identify and separate the knowns from the unknowns.
— These passages come from Elizondo's own book, not from a released government document. No public record of the AATIP list has ever been declassified.
But, is this psyOp?
In 1997 the CIA published its own history of the agency's involvement with UFOs, written by National Reconnaissance Office historian Gerald K. Haines and drawn from a review of every agency file on the subject, ordered in 1993 by then-director R. James Woolsey. Two passages from that study follow.
1953 — the debunking campaign
The panel found no threat and no extraterrestrials — only a flood of reports clogging government channels.
To meet these problems, the panel recommended that the National Security Council debunk UFO reports and institute a policy of public education to reassure the public of the lack of evidence behind UFOs. It suggested using the mass media, advertising, business clubs, schools, and even the Disney corporation to get the message across.CIA — "A Die-Hard Issue: CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90", p. 72
1950s-60s — what the CIA later estimated
The CIA's own spy plane flew at 60,000 feet. Airliners flew between 10,000 and 20,000.
According to later estimates from CIA officials who worked on the U-2 project and the OXCART (SR-71, or Blackbird) project, over half of all UFO reports from the late 1950s through the 1960s were accounted for by manned reconnaissance flights (namely the U-2) over the United States. This led the Air Force to make misleading and deceptive statements to the public in order to allay public fears and to protect an extraordinarily sensitive national security project.CIA — "A Die-Hard Issue: CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90", p. 73
What about God?
The oldest institution in the West has spent two thousand years explaining what is above us. Asked what it would do if something arrived, it has answered in public — while others keep asking what it holds in private.

A pope is asked about Martians
On May 12, 2014, preaching on the passage where the apostles argue over the Holy Spirit descending on gentiles, Pope Francis reached for a hypothetical. In the translation carried by TIME:
If tomorrow, for example, an expedition of Martians arrives and some of them come to us… and if one of them says: "Me, I want to be baptized!", what would happen?
He answered himself, in the same breath: "Who are we to close doors?" The homily was about who the Church is allowed to turn away. The Martians were the example.
Inside the Vatican the question is not a throwaway. It runs its own astronomical observatory, and that observatory's director, the Jesuit brother Guy Consolmagno, co-wrote a whole book that takes the same question at face value.
The Holy See never published this homily in full. What exists is the reporting from that day.
The question nobody dares to ask
Ten years later the US Conference of Catholic Bishops reported that researchers were seeking access to the Vatican Apostolic Archive. Diana Walsh Pasulka, professor of religious studies at UNC Wilmington, argues it holds accounts of nuns witnessing orbs entering their cells, flying houses and other aerial phenomena — filed as miracles. Garry Nolan, a Stanford professor of medicine who co-founded the Sol Foundation in 2023, believes the archive holds knowledge relevant to understanding UFOs.
The same article carries the reply of Marco Grilli, secretary to the prefect of the archives:
There is no document in the archives that regards extraterrestrial life.
The claim and the denial sit in the same place: a news service of the Catholic bishops of the United States.

Bottom line
Are they
Already here?
While they argue
The record of this subject is not only made of documents about objects. It is also made of documents about people — the ones who were near something, reported it, or were sent to work out what had happened to them.

Two answers from the same government
Since 2016, U.S. personnel have reported around 1,500 anomalous health incidents across 96 countries — headaches, vertigo, cognitive damage, with no agreed cause. In March 2023 the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published its assessment, updated in December 2024. Most agencies concluded it is "very unlikely" that a foreign adversary is behind them.
In December 2024 the Subcommittee on the Central Intelligence Agency of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence published an interim report of its own. This is its title, in full:
Investigating the Intelligence Community's Conclusions on Anomalous Health Incidents: Is the Intelligence Community Hiding the Real Reason for This Phenomenon?
Neither document mentions UAP as a cause. What they establish is narrower and stranger: two arms of the same government, in the same month, disagreeing in public about why their own people are ill.
Who gets called when people are hurt
Garry Nolan is a professor of pathology at Stanford. He says he was approached by people representing the government and an aerospace corporation, not to look at craft, but to look at people: to help work out the medical harm suffered by individuals after alleged interactions with something anomalous. They came to him for the blood analysis his lab is able to do.
The vocabulary of that request is worth noticing. Nobody asked him about beings or vehicles. He was asked about radiation, about injury, about what happens to a body that has been near something.
Nolan went on to co-found the Sol Foundation in 2023 with Peter Skafish, to give academics a place to discuss the subject without being laughed at — which is itself a description of the problem.
Nolan's account of these cases comes from interviews, not from a published paper. His peer-reviewed work in this area is on materials analysis, not on patients.
What it costs to say it
Two ways of coming forward, and two ways of being left alone. Civilians are told the thing they are describing does not exist. Servicemen are heard, filed, and answered with silence.
1980 — Cash–Landrum
On the evening of December 29, 1980, on a road near Dayton, Texas, Betty Cash, 51, Vickie Landrum, 57, and her seven-year-old grandson Colby said they came upon a diamond-shaped object throwing out flame and heat, with helicopters around it. Within hours all three were vomiting, their eyes burning, their skin as if sunburnt. Cash was in hospital from January 2 to 19 with blistering and skin loss; by April, Landrum had a cataract. They sued the United States government for twenty million dollars. In August 1986 the court dismissed the case, being "persuaded by their testimony (and other evidence) that no agency of the U.S. government possessed any such UFO, and that no military personnel had operated any of the reported helicopters."
The medical link is contested: notes from Cash's own attending physician later attributed her hair loss to alopecia areata. What is not contested is the shape of the answer — three civilians arrived with hospital records, and the state replied that the thing which hurt them did not exist.
Cash–Landrum — the injuries, the lawsuit and its dismissal1989 — Bob Lazar
He told Las Vegas television he had worked on recovered craft at a site south of Area 51. What followed was not a debate about the craft, it was a debate about him. He claims degrees from MIT and Caltech, and neither institution has any record of him — Stanton Friedman instead found him enrolled at a junior college in Los Angeles in those same years. Los Alamos told the station in 1989 that he was not on its staff. And yet a 1982 article in the Los Alamos Monitor and a laboratory phone directory do place him there, apparently through a contractor.
A long-standing position within the UAP community — the one Jeremy Corbell's 2018 documentary argues — is that the records were removed to discredit him. That is a claim, not a finding.
Bob Lazar — the documented record and the disputes around itDylan Borland
A former U.S. Air Force geospatial intelligence specialist, he testified under oath before the House Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets on September 9, 2025, having already reported to the Intelligence Community Inspector General and to AARO.
Since my ICIG complaint, I have been prevented from resuming my prior employment and can confirm I am still blacklisted from certain agencies within the Intelligence Community.
What he says he saw is his own account. The reprisals he describes are in his written statement to Congress.
House Oversight — written testimony of Dylan Borland, September 9, 2025Jeffrey Nuccetelli
Sixteen years as an Air Force military police officer. He testified at the same hearing about five UAP incidents at Vandenberg Air Force Base between 2003 and 2005 — among them a glowing red square reported by Boeing contractors over two missile defence sites. Each was witnessed by several people, documented, investigated and passed up the chain.
We sent information up, but no guidance came down.
He says the Air Force records of the red square incident are now held by AARO and the FBI. Six other service members provided the accounts he brought with him.
House Oversight — written testimony of Jeffrey Nuccetelli, September 9, 2025Who or what could they be?




Angels or Aliens?
- Race:
- The Greys
- Origin:
- Zeta Reticuli, read off a drawing — never confirmed
- First report:
- White Mountains, New Hampshire, September 19-20, 1961
- Reported by:
- Betty and Barney Hill
Grey skin, a cranium too large for the body, no ears or nose to speak of, and the eyes — which take over every account written after 1961. Nobody had drawn this face before the Hills. It arrives in 1964, in a psychiatrist 's office in Boston, out of Barney Hill under hypnosis:
All I see are these eyes… I'm not even afraid that they're not connected to a body. They're just there. They're just up close to me, pressing against my eyes.
From there it travels. A bestseller in 1966, a prime-time film with James Earl Jones in 1975, Spielberg's design in 1977, and by 1987 the face on the cover of Communion is what the word alien means. In 1994, sixty-two schoolchildren outside Harare described the same eyes to a BBC crew. In 1995 a fake autopsy sold to thirty countries used the same skull.
Zeta Reticuli comes from a star map Betty Hill drew under hypnosis, matched to real stars by the schoolteacher Marjorie Fish and published in Astronomy in 1974. It is a reading of a drawing.
- Race:
- The Nordics, or the Space Brothers
- Origin:
- Venus, later the Pleiades — claimed, never evidenced
- First report:
- Colorado Desert, California, November 20, 1952
- Reported by:
- George Adamski
Tall, fair, and close enough to us to pass in a crowd. The only type that comes to talk. Adamski said one stepped out of a scout ship in the desert east of Palm Springs, gave the name Orthon, communicated without speaking, and warned him about what nuclear testing was releasing into space:
In fact, in different clothing he could easily have passed for an unusually beautiful woman; yet he definitely was a man.
Note the date. Fourteen months earlier a film had opened in which a tall, calm, human-looking visitor lands and warns Earth about its own weapons. What follows Adamski is a movement: from 1954 a yearly convention at Giant Rock in the Mojave, thousands of people in the desert waiting for a landing; Bethurum and his Aura Rhanes from the planet Clarion; Fry, Menger, Van Tassel. In 1975 a Swiss farmer starts photographing ships from the Pleiades.
Nobody in this tradition reports being examined. They report being chosen. Adamski's account is catalogued by Denver Public Library as laughably fraudulent; Billy Meier's ex-wife described the ships as bin lids and carpet tacks.
- Race:
- The Reptilians
- Origin:
- None claimed in the original report
- First report:
- Ashland, Nebraska, December 3, 1967
- Reported by:
- Sgt. Herbert Schirmer, Nebraska State Patrol
A patrolman on night duty stops for an object on the road outside Ashland. The Condon Committee — the Air Force-funded study run at the University of Colorado — takes the case and files it as Case 42:
Evaluation of psychological assessment tests, the lack of any evidence, and interviews with the patrolman, left project staff with no confidence that the trooper's reported UFO experience was physically real.
Read the file and you find an object: shape, lights, portholes. No occupants, anywhere. The faces and the uniforms with the winged-serpent badge arrive on February 13, 1968, under hypnosis with the psychologist Leo Sprinkle — after the case was closed. Then the species leaves the witness behind entirely. A television series in 1983 puts human-looking reptiles among us. Through the 1980s the legend of an underground base at Dulce grows out of a real Air Force disinformation operation run against an electronics engineer in New Mexico. In 1999 David Icke turns the whole thing into a ruling bloodline, and an anonymous text starts circulating that claims to be an interview with a reptilian woman.
The political scientist Michael Barkun traces the idea through conspiracist and occult circles well before Icke, and devotes a chapter to reading it as a vehicle for antisemitism. The interview has no audio, no full transcript and no named author.
- Race:
- The Insectoids, or Mantids
- Origin:
- Unknown, and rarely even claimed
- First report:
- Contested — Cincinnati, 1957, first told in 1992
- Reported by:
- Second-hand, at a conference held at MIT
Tall, thin, articulated, standing back while the Greys work. In the abduction literature the mantis is never the one holding the instruments — it is the one watching, and the witnesses read it as the authority in the room. Budd Hopkins and David Jacobs built that hierarchy out of hundreds of hypnosis sessions through the 1980s and 1990s. Whitley Strieber, in Communion, never names a species: it is the joints and the way his visitors moved that struck him as insect-like.
This is the one type with no founding case. The earliest report usually cited was told in 1992, at the Abduction Study Conference held at MIT, by the researcher Brian Thompson: a nurse he knew had seen a three-foot mantis-like figure in Cincinnati in 1957. A thirty-five-year-old memory, relayed by someone else.
The mantis also turns up a long way from any spacecraft. Between 1990 and 1995, in a government-approved study at the University of New Mexico, Rick Strassman injected sixty volunteers with DMT and recorded what they said they met. In 2020 a Johns Hopkins team surveyed 2,561 people who had inhaled the same compound: the words they reached for most were being, guide, spirit, alien. Seventy-two per cent still believed the entity was real after the drug wore off.
The Johns Hopkins paper does not count mantids, and Strassman is a psychiatrist studying a molecule, not a species. What the two bodies of reports share is a shape, described by people who were nowhere near each other.
Is there more than meets the eye?
time is stranger than we imagine, and may be the key to the UAP mystery.
— Luis Elizondo, on the sixth observable, in Imminent, 2024.

What if
They've been here
All along?
Final thoughts
If you made it this far, thank you for coming along. The UFO/UAP subject isn't just one rabbit hole, it's a whole tangle of rabbit holes running into each other.
If you're into this the way I am, you know how much material, trivia and side stories have been left out — never mind everything floating around online that can't be verified, not even down to its sources. Apologies in advance if I've skipped something, big or small: I did my best to put together real facts, stories, analysis and documents.
It's a stigmatised subject, and an interdisciplinary one, with roots in folklore, in science, in culture — and it ends up reaching all the way into theology.
The main goal of this site was entertainment. Beyond the simple "so, do you believe in aliens?", it's a subject that leaves me with a lot of questions, about us and about what's out there.
So I wanted to gather in one page all the stories that have fascinated me from when I was a kid up until now.
I'm also leaving you a link to a YouTube channel I've been following for a long time, Area 52. The guy is a phenomenon, and I promise you'll be glued to the screen if you want to go deeper.
One last thank you, and by no means the least, to my partner, who puts up with me and stands by me through all my passions, and who has watched this project grow from the very beginning.
Cheers from Italy. It's just here, it's all that Is.